Romans 6

Nhưng bây giờ anh em đã được giải phóng khỏi tội lỗi và trở nên nô lệ của Đức Chúa Trời, thì kết quả mà anh em được là sự thánh hóa, và cuối cùng được sự sống đời đời.

Vì tiền công của tội lỗi là sự chết, nhưng sự ban cho của Đức Chúa Trời là sự sống đời đời trong Đấng Christ Jêsus, Chúa chúng ta.
Rô-ma 6:22‭-‬23 

http://But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life. For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:22‭-‬23 NIV https://bible.com/bible/111/rom.6.22-23.NIV

Có một câu kinh thánh khác: tôi sống là sống cho Chúa và chết cũng là chết cho Chúa.

Nếu được nghe rằng bạn là người được Chúa chọn, hay người có Chúa thì chúng ta biết đó không phải là sự ngẫu nhiên mà có thể là sự sắp đặt của Thượng Đế.

Chính Phao-lô là người như vậy, ông nghe được Chúa Giêsu phán, Chúa bảo ông nên làm gì.

Tại sao chúng ta tin Chúa Giêsu là con của Thượng Đế và hưởng ơn phước không những trong đời này mà còn sự sống đời đời đó là một dấu hỏi thuộc về tâm linh.

Phaolô nói về tình yêu và trong thư La Mã sách Kinh Thánh Romans 6 này lại chỉ ra rằng ơn phước tuyệt vời nhất là được làm việc cho Đức Chúa Trời - Thượng Đế  như một người làm công, như "nô lệ" và được trả công bằng sự thánh khiết - thánh hóa và Sự Sống Đời Đời theo tiêu chuẩn của "Vương quốc thiên đàng" mà con người luôn hằng ao ước trong tâm linh.

Điều này giải thích tại sao con người khi còn sống trong vũ trụ này nếu chỉ biết thỏa mãn những nhu cầu của thể xác và không có đời sống tâm linh - một sự tương giao với Thượng Đế theo cách Phaolô trình bày hiểu được câu hỏi: Tại sao người ta sợ chết và sợ rơi xuống địa ngục sau khi chết.

Kính lạy Chúa xin dạy chúng con biết ăn năn và nhận được ơn phước như Chúa hứa với chúng con, trong danh Chúa Giêsu Amen.

Tạ ơn Chúa

http://https://bible.com/bible/151/rom.6.22-23.VIE2010

Meinung

25.02.2021, 06:59 GASTBEITRAG

Wiesendangers Wuhan-Studie ist ein wichtiger Anstoß

Lesedauer: 5 Minuten

Gerhard Strate
(The Hamburg lawyer Gerhard Strate is one of the most prominent criminal defense lawyers in Germany.)

The nanoscientist's collection of materials directs attention to dangerous virus production in laboratories. He deserves our thanks for that.

We remember: at the general debate in the Bundestag on December 9th, the Chancellor explained the motives that led her to study physics in the GDR. Much can be overridden, but not the laws of gravity and the speed of light.

We have to take “science” seriously.

And she explicitly referred to the recommendations of the Leopoldina published the day before.

These were aimed at a tough lockdown on December 14th. Only two sources were given in this statement. The actual text was only four and a half pages long and limited to simple expressions of opinion.

In the media, however, there was only occasional criticism of the pathetic way in which “science” presented itself here under the venerable name of the Leopoldina.

Hamburg university study on laboratory accident in Wuhan

The storm of indignation caused by a study presented at the University of Hamburg on the origin of the corona pandemic is all the more striking. In the nanoscientist Prof. Dr. Roland Wiesendanger, he came to the conclusion that "both the number and the quality of the evidence clearly indicate a laboratory accident at the virological institute in Wuhan as the cause of the current pandemic".

In the introduction, Wiesendanger explains that neither for the theory of the laboratory accident nor for the possibility of the virus being transmitted naturally via an intermediate host to humans, there is “science-based evidence in the strict sense”, which is why “currently only indications are given” which one or make other theory appear more likely ”.

Corona and the manipulation of viruses And that is exactly what his study does: it offers an extensive collection of material with countless research approaches and puts its finger in a wound, the sheer existence of which the public has barely taken notice of to this day.

It is called gain-of-function research and serves the goal of “manipulating viruses with regard to higher transmission capacity, danger and mortality rates”. 

What is taking place in several laboratories around the world, including in Wuhan, is the artificial generation of the most aggressive virus variants possible. Even if this goal may serve purely research purposes and one does not even want to think about the possibility of biological warfare, Wiesendanger is exactly right when he writes: "The question of the origin of the current coronavirus pandemic is undoubtedly particularly significant with regard to future measures to reduce the likelihood of an outbreak of similar pandemics. "

Simple malice against a Hamburg professor So far, so legitimate: why shouldn't one be allowed to raise the question of the origin of a virus that has kept the entire world in suspense for over a year? Should only proven epidemiologists have the right to put the actions of the virus-breeding sorcerer's apprentices to the test? But the automated reactions to Wiesendanger's publication are as expected: The “wave of anger against Hamburg professor” (“Bild”) ranges from simple malice to accusations of disinformation. Headlines such as "Hamburg professor brings his own university with corona study‘ in need of explanation "hastily clarify how Wiesendanger's work should be viewed.

According to today's logic, it was unfortunately to be expected that his own dean's office would promptly distance itself from Wiesendanger.

We do not know whether Prof. Wiesendanger is correct with his thesis or not. From the beginning he left no doubt that he did not know this himself either. The claim made by many critics that his paper is not a study at all is still wrong, because the term “study” has several meanings: In addition to a complete scientific elaboration, the term can also be used to describe drafts and sketchy preparatory work for a scientific work.

With his extensive collection of material, Wiesendanger has done such preparatory work and placed it in the hands of the public. Thanks to him and the University of Hamburg for this. Deriving the right questions from this and initiating the long-overdue discussion about the extent to which people around the world are willing to accept the generation of deadly viruses in laboratories would be the order of the day for journalists. The stencil-like lace-making of long-worn interpretive grids while bypassing the core topic will no longer be viable as a media business model in the future.

Photo: Karin Elmers

Der Hamburger Anwalt Gerhard Strate ist einer der prominentesten Strafverteidiger Deutschlands.
 

(Google translate)

https://www.abendblatt.de/meinung/article231651899/Wuhan-Studie-Corona-Labor-Unfall-Universitaet-Hamburg-Wiesendanger-Lenzen-Kommentar-Abendblatt-Gerhard-Strate.html